“Labour to reverse ‘tax cut for the rich’ pension reform if it wins the next election”

Mar 16, 2023 | Pensions

Only around 10% of our clients were lucky enough to have, or be likely to have, pensions which exceed the lifetime allowance of £1m or so. So that makes the proportion of the population as a whole which this affects still smaller, which I guess is why it seemed like a good idea to introduce it in the first place. It was the Rule of Unexpected Consequences which made it a problem, as those most likely to have pensions big enough to be taxed turned out to be senior civil servants and hospital consultants with good, old fashioned, gold-plated, government-funded pensions; and many of them decided to retire early rather than lose a big chunk in tax. The next Unexpected Consequence, however, is that Labour have promised to un-scrap it so my guess is that, instead of sticking around, many of those doctors will decide to retire now and get out while the going is good. 

Read more here

coins, currency, investment
“Why you should never retire”

“Why you should never retire”

On my 50th birthday, I will always remember, amongst the card or two I received was a letter from Saga’ who’d managed to find out my age through the wonder of the internet, and were pleased to tell me I now qualified to join my parents and go on holiday with them.

“National insurance cut raises questions over state pension funding”

“National insurance cut raises questions over state pension funding”

In an election year, all parties will try to be all things to all men. Mostly, it’s only stuff which matters ‘on the doorstep’ which matters. In isolation, Mrs Miggins (not my invention) will be delighted that her pension has gone up with the highest measure of inflation; and no one running a business will be complaining that National Insurance has been reduced.