“Redress to be paid after advice to invest in unregulated Brazilian property scheme”

Oct 24, 2019 | Financial Services

If you thought I was making this stuff up, here we go again, but a day later yet another client-advised-to-invest-pension-in-non-existent-property-scheme story. The never-built property was supposedly in Brazil; why would you ever touch it with a bargepole?  Beats me, but it’s likely, as the adviser’s company is now in liquidation, that ‘the liabilities incurred following the complaint will fall onto the Financial Services Compensation Scheme’. So we’ll be coughing up on her behalf.

Read more here

“Advisers fearful of further compliance and regulation”

“Advisers fearful of further compliance and regulation”

We know, of course we know, that regulation is, or at least should be a ‘good thing’. If those who need or should seek advice can be confident that they’ll be told the right thing, that someone has looked at those ’too good to be true’ investments before they’re allowed to take your money; or, in the case of a Woodford, while they’re raking it in to make sure it’s going where it’s supposed to.