“PI woes force 100-adviser strong network to fold”

Nov 24, 2020 | Financial Services

Pass me my ‘been-in-this-business-a-long-time-and-seen-it-all-before-world-weary-and-cynical’ hat, please, Mrs. H. Every dozen years or so, both start-ups and big companies (usually with new CEOs) decide it’s a good idea to take on or buy loads of advisers, conquer the advice market and make big profits with supposed economies of scale. And every time the costs of controlling and insuring loads of advisers, most intent on doing their own thing, and of keeping the regulator at bay, get them in the end. And round we go again.

Read more here

dustin tramel zpwpVBjMX3g unsplash scaled
“Advisers fearful of further compliance and regulation”

“Advisers fearful of further compliance and regulation”

We know, of course we know, that regulation is, or at least should be a ‘good thing’. If those who need or should seek advice can be confident that they’ll be told the right thing, that someone has looked at those ’too good to be true’ investments before they’re allowed to take your money; or, in the case of a Woodford, while they’re raking it in to make sure it’s going where it’s supposed to.