“Will PI cover break advisory firms?”

Jun 20, 2019 | Financial Services

I was involved in an FT podcast this week, on the cost of and problems getting professional indemnity insurance for financial advisers. What I learnt from the other expert (yes, I know) on the panel, was that the problem is not that the insurers have to fork out for lots of claims against us, quite the opposite. It’s that our regulators and the ombudsmen might at any time change the rules or order a review of certain kinds of business which might, who knows, lead to claims; and a field day for the cold callers and texters: ‘Have you ever had a financial adviser? Did they wear a red tie and drive a Porsche…?”

Read more here

sums 1
“Advisers fearful of further compliance and regulation”

“Advisers fearful of further compliance and regulation”

We know, of course we know, that regulation is, or at least should be a ‘good thing’. If those who need or should seek advice can be confident that they’ll be told the right thing, that someone has looked at those ’too good to be true’ investments before they’re allowed to take your money; or, in the case of a Woodford, while they’re raking it in to make sure it’s going where it’s supposed to.